View archived CACEO newsletters and articles here.


 

New Co-Chair and Election Legislation Update

SB 450, the Vote Center bill still continues to lead the discussion at our meetings.  There have been some suggested amendments on the ratios of voters to vote centers and we are expecting to see these in print soon, with a Hearing scheduled sometime in April.

SB 967, the bill that would pay for special elections passed out of Committee but it now heads to Appropriations.  CACEO has taken a support position on this bill.

AB 2911, is the longest bill.  It is 51 pages clarifying what is a state or a county voter information guide.  Thanks to John Gardner and his committee for this clean-up language.

Another bill, AB 2265, was also a proposal from CACEO.  Cathy Darling Allen and Gail Pellerin proposed to allow the county counsel when preparing the impartial analysis to clarify what a yes vote means and what a no vote means.

Other bills cover allowing 16 and 17 year olds to vote in school board elections, felon voting rights, who can return a vote by mail ballot, expanding San Diego’s all mail ballot pilot to fill special vacancies and make it available state wide, and the daily posting of precinct results during the canvass.  You can see a complete list of the bills and their status on the CACEO website at caceo58.org.

 

Clerks of the Board: Got a Legislative Proposal for CACEO Sponsorship?

Legislative proposals suitable for CACEO sponsorship that impact Clerk of the Board programs should focus on improving or streamlining the processes and programs administered by COBs. Primarily such legislation will be technical in nature and will usually not involve controversial policy issues. If you are considering submitting a proposal for sponsorship, bear in mind that legislation that merely shifts workload and administrative responsibility to the state or to another local government officer is not likely to be successful without very significant justification.

You also may have identified one or more code sections that use the term “clerk” or “county clerk” that is either out date or needs clarification as to whether it refers to the county clerk, the clerk of the board, registrar of voters the clerk of the superior court, or the city clerk. CACEO has had an ongoing program for decades designed to clear up these ambiguities.

Included in the information that the proposal form requires is specific legislative language adding, amending, or repealing the code section or sections dealing with the subject. It also requires an explanation of exactly what the proposal would do; a description of what problems the proposed legislation would solve; specifically how the proposal would affect the Clerk of the Board; a justification for the proposal; a listing of other code sections that would be affected, if any; a description and estimate of cost savings to your office or to COBs statewide; a listing of other agencies that would be affected, if any; and your best guess as to who might support or oppose the legislation.

Legislative proposals should be sent to John McKibben, Chairman of the COB Legislative Committee, no later than November 20, 2015 at [email protected] or at 500 West Temple St., Room 383, Los Angeles CA 90012. Or you may fax it to John’s attention at (213) 620-0636. If the COB Legislative Committee approves the proposal, it will be voted upon by CACEO’s COB members at New Law Workshop in Sacramento on Thursday, December 10, 2015.

If you have questions, call John at (213) 200-9610.

 

COB's and New Law

The day starts with the usual presentation on legislation enacted this year that will affect Clerks of the Board and discuss any legislation that has been proposed by member Clerks for CACEO sponsorship.  You’ll also hear about the “bullets” that you didn’t know you dodged in the form of legislation that would have had a negative workload or financial impact had it not been for CACEO lobbyist Matt Siverling and the COB Legislative Committee.

Next Carla Johnson, Director of the Mayor of San Francisco’s Office on Disability will discuss how San Francisco integrated the principals and requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) into the everyday work flow of the Clerk of the Board’s operations.  She will discuss how Clerks can use technology to make meetings, material, Websites, and agendas accessible.  Clerks will learn about what constitutes a “reasonable accommodation” under the ADA in terms of the operations of the Clerk of the Board, and learn about what San Francisco has done to combine communication access, architectural features, and reasonable accommodations to make meetings and services truly accessible under the ADA.  Clerks can find out how they might apply these techniques in their own county and thus avoid expensive litigation.

In the afternoon, we will have an extremely important, timely, and informative panel discussion on this year’s legislative hot topic, “Open Data.”  Two bills are on the Governor’s desk right now dealing with Open Data that would amend the California Public Records Act and that will directly affect all local agencies, including Clerks of the Board, and they are likely to be signed by Gov. Brown.  But what is Open Data, especially to Clerks in our administering the CPRA, and what does it mean to Clerks of the Board generally?  

Hear a panel comprised of Robb Korinke of GrassrootsLab, the chief supporter of AB 169 (Maienschein) and SB 272 (Hertzberg), bills that were subject to a lot of CACEO lobbying; Assemblymember Brian Maienschein, the author of AB 169 (invited); Jim Ewart, Chief Counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association; Marcia Cunningham, Director of Strategic Business Technology for Stanislaus County; and Krista Whitman, Assistant County Counsel of Sacramento County who will discuss the impact of Open Data on local agencies and on Clerk operations, and what the future holds for future Open Data legislation affecting the CPRA.  Don’t miss this one!

And finally – and perhaps best of all – in the second half of the afternoon, Clerks of the Board will meet with E. Dotson Wilson, Chief Clerk of the Assembly, and his staff at the Capitol in the Assembly Chambers to learn about how the Chief Clerk supports a REALLY big legislative body.  It is a rare treat to be able to meet with Mr. Wilson, especially on the Assembly Floor.  Mr. Wilson has asked that Clerks come prepared to share their own technological and other innovations in clerking a legislative body in the session’s Q & A.  This is another session not to be missed!

 
CACEO January 2015

CACEO Secretary of State Transition Committee

Thursday, December 11, 2014
5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
2014 CRAC & CACEO New Law Workshop and Seminar
Hyatt Regency, Sacramento, Trinity Meeting Room (mezzanine level)

Minutes

Meeting was called to order by Neal Kelley at 5:10 p.m.

All committee members were in attendance (Neal Kelley, Orange County; Dean Logan, Los Angeles County; Sue Ranochak, Mendocino County; Joe Holland, Santa Barbara County; Cathy Darling Allen, Shasta County; Rebecca Martinez, Madera County; Mark Lunn, Ventura County; Bill Rousseau, Sonoma County; Jennifer Vise, Tehama County). Also in attendance was James

Schwab from Secretary-Elect Alex Padilla’s team.

Bill Rousseau opened by stating that he was looking forward to having an open dialog with the incoming Secretary of State; James Schwab stated it was his desire, as well as Secretary-Elect Padilla, to remain open; he will continue this theme throughout his term.

James informed the committee that Bill Mabie will be serving as Secretary-Elect Padilla’s Chief of Staff; James will be based in Sacramento and Bill will be based in Los Angeles.

Neal Kelley asked James how he would like the committee to communicate with the office; James suggested a brief memorandum to the Secretary of State outlining the committee’s goals and objectives; policy concerns; recommendations; etc.

Neal asked committee members to state their main concerns and offer suggestions on what the committee should focus on as a part of the transition.

Dean Logan noted that legislation would be critical to track and communicate; James offered that engagement on the policy side should be communicated earlier in the process.

Neal offered that the committee should engage on many of the themes discussed during the campaign (such as VoteCal; Cal-Access; voter engagement and election technology (and the possibility of a Bond Act to fund election equipment).

Bill stated that voting engagement will be key to turn out and suggested the committee offer suggestions on how the Secretary of State could engage statewide with voters.

The committee agreed that it would form a list of policy issues and interpreations made by the Secretary of State since 2006. It was agreed that members of the committee would track theses issues using CCROVs from 2006 to present. This would be used to form the committee’s memo to the Secretary of State. Research on this project was divided up between committee members as follows:

2006 and 2007 (Neal)
2008 – 2010 (Dean))
2012 (Bill)
2011 (Sue Ranochak)
2013 (Mark Lunn)

The committee agreed to conduct its next meeting in January 2015 followed by a meeting with Secretary-Elect Padilla sometime in February 2015.

 

Committee members:

  • Neal Kelley, Orange County
  • Dean Logan, Los Angeles County
  • Sue Ranocheck, Mendocino County
  • Joe Holland, Santa Barbara County
  • Cathy Darling Allen, Shasta County
  • Rebecca Martinez, Madera County
  • Mark Lunn, Ventura County
  • Bill Rousseau, Sonoma County
  • Jennifer Vise, Tehama County

-------------------------------------------------------------------

View PDF version of minutes.

 
CACEO January 2015

2014 CRAC & CACEO New Law Workshop and Seminar Photos

 

 

 
<< first < Prev 1 2 Next > last >>

Page 1 of 2